Analisa Hasil Ujian Sekolah Dasar Tahun Pelajaran 2017-2018

Adams, Lengkung langit. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 103(3), 152–153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010

Ariyanti, H. P. (2016). Pengaruh pembelajaran matematika realistik terhadap kemampuan matematis peserta (ditinjau berpokok kemampuan representasi dan komunikasi). Buana Matematika : Koran Ilmiah Ilmu hitung Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2:), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.36456/buanamatematika.v6i2:.367

Bagiyono, B. (2017). Analisis tingkat kesukaran dan buku pengimbang butir soal eksamen pelatihan radiografi tingkat 1. Widyanuklida, 16(1), 1–12. http://jurnal.batan.go.id/index.php/widyanuklida/article/view/4068

Bernard, M., & Senjayawati, E. (2019). Meningkatkan kemampuan koneksi matematik peserta SMP dengan menggunakan pendekatan metaphorical thinking berbantuan software geogebra. Jurnal Mercumatika : Jurnal Penggalian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.26486/jm.v3i2.558

Bichi, A. A. (2016). Classical Test Theory: an introduction to linear modeling approach to test and item analysis. International Journal for Social Studies, 2(9), 27–33.

Cappelleri, J. C., Jason Lundy, J., & Hays, R. D. (2014). Overview of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory for the quantitative assessment of items in developing patient-reported outcomes measures. Clinical Therapeutics, 36(5), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.04.006

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory Mason. Cengage Learning.

Dahlan, D., Permana, L., & Oktariani, M. (2020). Teacher’s competence and difficulties in constructing hots instruments in economics subject . T Pendidikan, 39(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.28869

Daryanto, D., Agung, I., & Siswantari, S. (2020). MGMP teacher organization empowerment in improving students’ komplikasi solving ability. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(1), 152. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0014

DeMars, C. E. (2018). Classical test theory and item response theory. In The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Tentamen (pp. 49–73). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch2

Fajaruddin, S., Retnawati, H., Yusron, E., & Sofyaningsih, V. (2021). Exploring the final examination test item characteristics of Pancasila and civic education in the regency of Gunungkidul. International Journal of Education and Learning, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i3.435

Fatkhudin, A., Surarso, B., & Subagio, A. (2016). Item response theory model empat parameter logistik pada computerized adaptive test. Surat kabar Sistem Wara-wara Bisnis, 4(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol4iss2pp121-129

Friatma, A., & Anhar, A. (2019). Analysis of validity, reliability, discrimination, difficulty and distraction effectiveness in learning assessment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387(1), 012063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012063

Haolader, F. A., Ali, M. R., & Foysol, K. M. (2015). The taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: Current practices at polytechnics in Bangladesh and its effects in developing students’ competences. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(2), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.2.2.9

Hasibuan, I. (2015). Hasil belajar peserta sreg materi bentuk Aljabar di Papan bawah VII SMP Area 1 Banda Aceh perian kursus 2013/2014. Koran Peluang, 4(1). http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/kebolehjadian/article/view/5853

Hasnah, H. (2017). Analisis kualitas soal ilmu hitung ujian sekolah kelas bawah XII IPA SMA Distrik di Watansoppeng berdasarkan teori respon granula. PEP Educational Assessment, 1(1). https://ojs.unm.ac.id/UEA/article/view/3776

Irvine, J. (2017). A comparison of revised Bloom and Marzano’s New Taxonomy of Learning. Research in Higher Education Journal, 33.

Islami, V., & Marthanthy, L. R. (2018). Amatan pengukuran kinerja direktorat kepelabuhanan pada Kementerian Sangkut-paut Kota Jakarta tahun 2016. Jurnal ECODEMICA, 2(1), 39–48. https://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/ecodemica/article/view/2642

Islamiyah, A. C., Prayitno, S., & Amrullah, A. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa SMP pada penyelesaian masalah sistem persamaan linear dua luwes. Buku harian Ilmu keguruan Matematika, 5(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v5i1.10035

Ismail, I. H. (2018). Estimasi kesalahan pengukuran pendekatan teori tes klasik dan teori respon butir soal tryout SBMPTN TPA. Universitas Wilayah Makassar.

Istiyono, E. (2018). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian dan kajian hasil sparing fisika dengan teori tes klasik dan beradab. UNY Press.

Jones, J., Gaffney-Rhys, R., & Jones, E. (2014). Handle with care! An exploration of the potential risks associated with the publication and summative usage of student evaluation of teaching (SET) results. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2012.699514

Jusrianto, J., Lahiriah, A., & Megawati, M. (2018). Analisis kualitas tes testing penghabisan semester mata kuliah pengetahuan komputer. Surat kabar Pengkajian Master Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.1.1.2018.7

Karagoz, M., & Cakir, M. (2011). Ki aib solving in genetics: Conceptual and procedural difficulties. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 1668–1674.

Ketterlin-Geller, L. R. (2005). Knowing what all students know: procedures for developing universal design for assessment. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(2). https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1649

Kusumawardani, D. R., Wardono, W., & Kartono, K. (2018). Pentingnya penalaran ilmu hitung dalam meningkatkan kemampuan literasi ilmu hitung. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu hitung, 1, 588–595. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/20201

Laily, N. I. (2019). Profil pemahaman pola dan pengetahuan prosedural siswa kerumahtanggaan menyelesaikan masalah pulang ingatan ruang sisi datar ditinjau dari level Van Hiele [Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu keguruan Institut Jember]. http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/102635

Mardapi, D., & Kartowagiran, B. (2013). Pengembangan instrumen pengukur hasil belajar nirbias dan terskala resmi. Kronik Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v15i2.1100

Natesan, P. (2011). A review of bayesian item response modeling: Theory and applications. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 36(4), 550–552. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998611411919

Ngaeni, E. T., & Saefudin, A. A. (2017). Menciptakan pembelajaran matematika nan efektif kerumahtanggaan penceraian masalah matematika dengan model pembelajaran komplikasi posing. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 264. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v6i2.896

Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 744–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21028

Pakpahan, R. (2015). Ujian sekolah sebagai upaya pemetaan mutu sekolah pangkal. Harian Pendidikan Dan Kultur, 21(2), 167–182.

Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori respons butir dan penerapannya: Bikin peneliti, pegiat pengukuran dan pengujian, mahasiswa pascasarjana. Nuha Medika.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif organ penelitian. Parama Publishing.

Retnawati, H., Kartowagiran, B., Arlinwibowo, J., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). Why are the mathematics national examination items difficult and what is teachers’ strategy to overcome it? International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10317a

Saepuzaman, D., Istiyono, E., Haryanto, H., Retnawati, H., & Yustiandi, Y. (2021). Analisis karakteristik granula soal fisika dengan pendekatan IRT penskoran dikotomus dan politomus. Radiasi : Surat kabar Periodik Pendidikan Fisika, 14(2), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.37729/radiasi.v14i2.1200

Saputra, A. N. S., Retnawati, H., & Yusron, E. (2021). Analysis difficulties and characteristics of item test of on biology national liwa school examination. 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.002

Konsentrat, R. M. M., Luritawaty, I. P., Dahlan, J. A., & Siregar, G. M. A. (2020). Analisis tanya ujian sekolah berstandar kebangsaan matematika sekolah semenjana pertama tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 4(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v4i2.1862

Sutriningsih, N., Pratiwi, R., & Utami, B. H. S. (2018). Penerapan contoh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe numbered head together (NHT) pada materi sistem kemiripan linear dua variabel (SPLDV). JURNAL E-DuMath, 4(2), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.52657/je.v4i2.717

Yulvisriani, Y., Suryawati, E., & Suzanti, F. (2020). The role of empowerment of dumai science teachers association (MGMP IPA) in improving the professional competency of junior high school science teacher. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(4), 821. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.4.4.p.821-833

Source: https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/4359

Posted by: and-make.com